It wouldn’t be an Oscars season without some controversy, and this year, it’s the strangely laudedEmilia Pérezthat’s making no sense to anyone outside the Academy. The comedy-musical-crime dramaEmilia Pérezstars trans actress Karla Sofía Gascón as a male-presenting Mexican cartel kingpin who enlists Zoe Saldaña’s lawyer in Mexico City to help her leave the cartel and go undercover to receive gender-affirming care and transition as a woman so she can live her life authentically as the titular Emilia Pérez.

Theunevenly-reviewedEmilia Pérezis also a story about Mexicans that features no Mexican leads, shot in France by a French director, Jacques Audiard, focusing on Spanish-fluent characters portrayed by actors criticized for a lack of authenticity in their accents. It’s a lot to unpack andthe backlash to it has been significant and ongoing(viaToday). That hasn’t stoppedEmilia Pérezfrom garnering over a dozen Oscars nominations, including Best Picture, and Best Actress for Gascón. The discrepancy has left plenty wondering how on earthEmilia Pérezmanaged to become the most-nominated movie for the 2025 Oscars, snagging 13 Academy Award nominations. It’s a fair question worth diving into and the answer reveals a lot about the current state of Hollywood.

Zoe-Saldana-from-Emila-Perez,-Adrian-Brody-from-The-Brutalist,-Demi-Moore-from-The-Substance,-and-Cynthia-Erivo-from-Wicked

Emilia Pérez Leads All Oscars Contenders Despite Not Impressing Critics & Audiences Hating It

For Once, Critics & Audiences Are Largely In Agreement

Currently,Emilia Pérezis sitting at a 71% score onMetacriticand a 75% critics score onRotten Tomatoes. While those aren’t necessarily bad scores, they’re not glowing, either – certainly not enough for a movie that’s getting this much Oscars buzz. One would expect to see scores in the 90th percentile, in this case, but it’s not. Its general critics' scores have been so low, in fact, that ifEmilia Pérezultimately takes home the biggest prize of the night at the 2025 Oscars,it will be the lowest-rated Best Picture winner sinceCrashin 2006.

Critics aren’t infallible, but it’s really telling thatEmilia Pérez’s Rotten Tomatoes critics' score is noticeably lower than any other 2025 Best Picture nominee.

Rita Moro (Zoe Saldana) shocked after receiving some of Emilia’s fingers following her kidnapping in Emilia Pérez

Critics aren’t infallible, but it’s really telling thatEmilia Pérez’s Rotten Tomatoes critics' score is noticeably lower than any other 2025 Best Picture nominee. Compare it to fellow nomineeA Complete Unknown, for example: despite that movie having the same Metacritic rating and a Rotten Tomatoes critics score 5% higher,it only has eight nominations toEmilia Pérez’s 13.Eight Oscar nominations is nothing to scoff at, but it’s not the juggernaut thatEmilia Pérezhas been.

95%

Emilia Perez 2024 Film Poster

85%

3

93%

91%

6

79%

8

90%

10

92%

5

2

89%

78%

88%

73%

80%

71%

75%

13

But this isn’t a case where critics were lukewarm on it and audiences loved it, either - across the board,audiences have hatedEmilia Pérez,evidenced by its controversy and backlash, as well asRotten Tomatoes' abysmal 26% audience score.Further, the very groups the movie was attempting to court - those of Mexican heritage and the LGBTQ+ community - were actively turned off by it, citingEmilia Pérez’s deeply problematic stereotypes of racism against Mexicans and Mexican culture (viaCBC), as well as transphobia (viaGLAAD). So critics aren’t impressed by it and audiences don’t like it at all, and yet, it somehow leads the pack of Oscars contenders in nominations. The reason for that is who votes for the Oscars.

Hollywood & Academy Voters Love Emilia Pérez (For The Wrong Reason)

It’s Worth Putting It Into Historical Context

For better or worse, it’s neither critics nor audiences who vote on the Oscars;it’s the Academy, and thus, it’s Hollywood.And, for whatever reason, Hollywood lovesEmilia Pérez. Part of this can be viewed through the lens of where Hollywood is at in the wake of the #OscarsSoWhite year. The movement erupted in 2015, when influencer and Black activist April Reign coined the hashtag to describe the Oscars acting nominees for that year: across four acting categories and 20 nominations, every single nominee was white. The same happened the next year, in 2016, and the outcry was enough to force the Academy to reexamine its voting body and if it was truly representative. To the surprise of no one, it wasn’t.

Since then, the Academy has taken strides to diversify its ranks, and to its credit, it has done a lot of work in that regard - butit still has miles to go before it fully gets its head around true equity in storytelling. It’s true that the Oscars acting and Best Picture categories have been more fairly balanced in recent years - mostly - which is great to see. There’s still plenty of room for improvement, but the work is at least being done, however, imperfectly.

The Academy still too quickly falls into the old habit of patting itself on the back for doing the bare minimum, and it still confuses tokenism for authentic representation.

But the Academy still too quickly falls into the old habit of patting itself on the back for doing the bare minimum, and it still confuses tokenism for authentic representation. So it’s not a surprise that Hollywood is falling all over itself to prop upEmilia Pérezas an example of powerful and diverse storytelling,even as the marginalized groups it purports to represent are roundly criticizing and rejecting its deeply offensive story.

Netflix’s FYC Campaign For Emilia Pérez Has Been An Onslaught

Netflix Has Paid & Paid Big To Make Their Movie A Contender

The other issue is that, despite what the Academy would have one believe,the Oscars are often a popularity contest.That’s not to say that no nominees deserve the nominations they get; the vast majority of them do deserve their nominations and their wins. Still, every year, there are a few head-scratching choices and snubs. Less frequently, but still evident, is when a movie that is mediocre at best, and usually also problematic or cliché, suddenly gets buzzy -Green Book, which won Best Picture in 2019 (arguably for many of the same reasons thatEmilia Pérezis getting buzz this year), comes to mind.

All 10 Oscars 2025 Best Picture Nominees, Ranked Worst To Best

The nominees for Best Picture at the 97th Academy Awards are all well-made films, but some of them stand out as real highlights of 2024’s film slate.

It’s why studios spend huge sums of money on FYC (for your consideration) campaigns during awards season; there are plenty of examples of movies that weren’t in heavy contention picking up steam heading into the new year thanks to a juggernaut FYC campaign. The dirty secret of the Academy Awards is that FYC campaigns can be a bit like a rich kid getting into a prestigious school because their parents paid a huge sum of money, not because they earned it. Netflix originally boughtEmilia Pérezat Cannes for $12 million after other distributors steered clearand reportedly has spent at least twice that much on its awards campaign(viaVariety). The streamer wantsEmilia Pérezto be a contender, and it’s willing to pay to get it there.

The dirty secret of the Academy Awards is that FYC campaigns can be a bit like a rich kid getting into a prestigious school because their parents paid a huge sum of money, not because they earned it.

Netflix has also been savvy enough to lean hard into the trans and Mexican inclusion aspect with its talent during awards season, putting its leading women front and center while making the press rounds, simultaneously either ignoring ordismissing the backlash toEmilia Pérez, with Gascón at one point referring to other members of the LGBTQ+ community as “stupid” for disliking the film, saying, “Being LGBTQ, having those labels, does not remove your stupidity.”

Still, when a streamer with the deep pockets of Netflix puts its considerable PR weight behind a movie, it makes waves, even if they’re not organic ones. And make no mistake,Netflix has put its full weight behindEmilia Pérez. It really, really wants one of itsNetflix Originals to finally win Best Picture, and the streamer is gunning for it to be this year.

Warning: The following section and image gallery contain deeply offensive examples of anti-Black and anti-Mexican racism, anti-Aram racism and Islamophobia, and misogyny.

Karla Sofía Gascón May Have Ruined Its Chances

That said, new controversy surrounding Gascón may be what tanksEmilia Pérez’s chances for a Best Picture Oscar – and possibly any Oscar.From the start,Gascón hasn’t handled criticism ofEmilia Pérezwith grace. “Many are running a negative, nasty campaign against the film,” she previously stated. That was directed at the PR team for fellow Best Actress competitor Fernanda Torres, nominated forI’m Still Here. Those statements were enough to get people to questionwhether Gascón had violated Academy rules with the accusations. It was decided she hadn’t broken any rules, and Gascón recently backtracked on her accusations, but the damage was done. It’s not exactly helped the backlash againstEmilia Pérezdie down.

Oscars 2025: Emilia Pérez Is Officially The Most-Nominated Movie, And The Internet Is Baffled

Emilia Pérez is officially the most-nominated movie at the 2025 Academy Awards, and the internet is understandably baffled by its 13 nods.

That combative approach only got more scrutinized this weekwhen old tweets of Gascón’s resurfaced, tweets that included wildly offensive anti-Black racism, anti-Arab racism and Islamophobia, and misogyny. An interview with Audiard also surfaced in which the director stated that Spanish “is the language of undeveloped countries, the poor, and migrants,” which has only added fuel to the fire of criticism against the director for his open disdain for portraying Mexican culture of Spanish accents with authenticity and care, and his disinterest in actually shooting in Mexico.

Still, the lion’s share of the controversy swirls around Gascón, and understandably so. It’s put enough negative attention on the actress and the film as a whole thatshe was finally made to issue what is being framed as an apology through Netflixfor her past comments, saying

“I want to acknowledge the conversation around my past social media posts that have caused hurt. As someone in a marginalized community, I know this suffering all too well and I am deeply sorry to those I have caused pain. All my life I have fought for a better world. I believe light will always triumph over darkness."

Audiences on social media aren’t buying it as a sincere apology, and it’s unclear if Academy voters will, either. While there was a lot of the aforementioned goodwill forEmilia Pérezbefore, that will likely not be the case now that the virulently racist comments of its lead actress have come to light. particularly as these comments weren’t made decades ago, but just a few years ago. It all remains to be seen what will happen on Oscars night. For now, Oscars voting ends on February 18.

The 2025 Oscars will air on Sunday, March 2 at 7:00pm EST/4:00pm PST on ABC and Hulu.